Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 5

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 02:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

redundant to {{Fb rbr t pos}} and unsustainable to make a new one of these for every league and every time the cutoffs change Frietjes (talk) 18:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

redundant to {{fb rbr t pos|p=4|r=15}}; it's unsustainable to create a new one of these everytime the cutoffs change Frietjes (talk) 17:55, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

redundant to {{fb rbr t pos|p=2|pp=3|r=15}}; it's unsustainable to create a new one of these everytime the cutoffs change, and problematic since editors frequently change the cutoffs for new articles which screws up older uses. Frietjes (talk) 17:52, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).