Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 December 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 11

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only used at one article and the content is fairly generic despite the template name (home/away team, score etc.). In any case the article is only referenced from the league’s page and may not be notable. Eldumpo (talk) 00:03, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:34, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 18:16, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

appears to be a fork of Template:Poland in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest Frietjes (talk) 23:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as Creator: I made the template due to a mistake where the actual Template:Poland in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest was not showing up, which made me believe there was no template. It should be deleted. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 23:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:07, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Completely redundant. The band itself is up for AfD as a non-notable group, but as none of their records are notable and there isn't a single link contained in this navbox, it's literally useless. Richard3120 (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Greek letter templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 23. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:History of fashion with Template:Fashion.
For plain convenience, "fashion" being on ongoing historical theme anyway. Chicbyaccident (talk) 15:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:56, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now tangential, duplicate, and non-existing articles have been removed there is hardly anything worth navigating. --woodensuperman 11:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now tangential, duplicate, and non-existing articles have been removed there is hardly anything worth navigating. --woodensuperman 11:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now duplicate and tangential links have been removed, there is nothing to navigate. --woodensuperman 11:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Infobox settlement wrappers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 19. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:39, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under WP:CSD#T3 as this navbox duplicates links all present in {{Media based on H. P. Lovecraft works}}. --woodensuperman 10:57, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tony, {{Media based on H. P. Lovecraft works}} is not currently under discussion. You seem to have confused it with another template, maybe {{Works of H. P. Lovecraft}}. I have already pointed this out to you. --woodensuperman 09:52, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see the talk page post now. There you say "the whole system of navboxes for Lovecraft is a complete mess". This is the wrong solution. {{Media based on H. P. Lovecraft works}} should be deleted or used only on derivatives of works that have at most a two or three derivatives (thus not having their own template). Most authors have a biographical template that encompasses their own work and templates for their individual works that have spawned lots of derivatives. Lovecraft has several templates, such as this, for works that have spawned derivatives. They should not be mashed together in a single template that is confusing to the reader and causes derivatives of one work to be on the page of derivatives of another work as well as causes variously-named derivatives to be points of confusion more than anything else.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:29, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The single navbox for all adaptations/media is absolutely the correct approach here, rather than individual templates, especially as some of this media is derived from multiple works, including two in this navbox: Necronomicon (film), which is based on three separate stories; and Call Girl of Cthulhu, which doesn't even seem to be based on "Cool Air", instead being "very loosely based on the writings of H. P. Lovecraft". No matter what happens with any of the other navboxes, this one is redundant. --woodensuperman 14:19, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).