Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 15

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:Railway lines in New South Wales. Gareth (talk) 22:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (unused) Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No point for such a template linking to one article and that's the only article it's transcluded in. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. May be some consensus to merge, but the other template was not tagged. Feel free to start a new discussion if you would like to see the templates merged. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same usage of {{2TeamBracket}} and {{Round2}}

Note:We can replace template after the discussion consensus reached. Hhkohh (talk) 13:29, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
| seed-width = | team-width = | score-width = | RD1= | RD1-seed1= | RD1-team1= | RD1-score1= | RD1-seed2= | RD1-team2= | RD1-score2= }}, you can see
Finals
   
 
 

Hhkohh (talk) 02:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • wow, so I have to explicitly seed parameters to have them not appear? that has to be the dumbest syntax I have ever seen. non-blank should be non-blank, blank should be blank, and not specified should be omitted. it's really too bad we aren't discussing {{2TeamBracket}} here, since you didn't tag that template for discussion. Frietjes (talk) 12:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Frietjes: See Module:TeamBracket#No seeds and there is no action on {{2TeamBracket}}, so no need to tag on that template. Hhkohh (talk) 14:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
in that case, absolutely keep and do not merge since there are no plans to change the dumb syntax in {{2TeamBracket}}. no idea why you would do that instead of |seeds=no. Frietjes (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of eight link, the band's article that was recently deleted, five of the band's album redlink articles that were never created and two albums they collabarated with the group Blood Axis. WP:NENAN, especially a band's who article was deleted. Aspects (talk) 00:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).