Jump to content

Talk:Ilz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 28 December 2014

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. There are enough oppose arguments making valid arguments that this can't go ahead. No consensus. (non-admin closure)  — Amakuru (talk) 11:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



– disambiguation – Inwind (talk) 23:31, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:54, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Although "Ilz" is ambiguous, and I don't see a primary topic among the river, the Austrian town or the IATA code. I would suggest moving this title to Ilz river (are parentheses really necessary?), and then making this page, Ilz, a three-entry disambiguation page. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 09:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You continue to be way ahead of me, Steel Man. How do you do that? – Paine  19:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Paine Ellsworth: Eh, I do what I can! :) Steel1943 (talk) 02:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Definitely, the airport is not a competitor for primary topic. A town of 2500 people against a 65km river? Ooh. That's tough. Google Books shows it as a no-brainer--about 60% of the links are irrelevant (misspellings, etc.) but a good 40% are about the river. None about the town that I could see. The German WP has a disambiguation page at de:Ilz, including a link to this that is impenetrable to me. (It also lists the airport and the Austrian town, of course, as well as an Israeli district, a second river and a boat?) All considered, it looks like the river is the most noteworthy thing historically. I'm sticking with it as WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Oppose. Red Slash 08:40, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.