User:Bellerophon/Dashboard
|
| Immediate requests | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 132 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 13 |
| Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests | 57 |
Possible vandalism
Enhanced editing toolbar: Bold text, Italic text, Example image, Heading text, Bulleted list item, Numbered list item, Indented line, Non-formatted text, Big text, Small text, Superscript text, Subscript text, Redirect, Table.
MediaWiki toolbar: Link title, External link, Example sound, Formula, Strike-through text, Table, Footnote.
Editing alerts:
- Removal of speedy deletion templates – detected by filter 29 (edit filter log)
- New article with no mention of title – detected by filter 96 (edit filter log)
- Very short new article – detected by filter 98 (edit filter log)
- Possible autobiography or conflict of interest – detected by filter 148 and 188 (edit filter log)
- Large unwikified new article – detected by filter 180 (edit filter log)
Reports
- 139.222.168.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:04, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Probably not vandalism, but their persistent failure to use edit summaries is not helpful. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- 69.118.17.88 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Declined. No disruption since being warned. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:57, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- 103.55.58.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined. No disruption since being warned. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- 43.241.64.62 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:52, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1700:ef30:31f0:fcef:58e3:f708:fd8d (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Emoedsheeren (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) [1] [2] [3] [4] 5 (LOUTSOCK on this one) And yes, I’m aware that I’ve done 3 reverts there myself, though I’d argue that 2 of them fall under the Vandalism reverting clause. Will cross that bridge only if necessary. I’ve left the houses edits out, as I’m not convinced they’re vandalism. MM (Give me info.) (Victories) 22:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Level I. This is a new user. Let's not assume the worst right off. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- 62.74.24.0/24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log) I found an IP of different ranks altering several of the articles related to different personalities including that include Raye and Rachel Weisz by repeatedly changing the two nationalities from British to English, because England is a country within and is part of the United Kingdom without having left a summary of editions to proceed to make this change and it already goes beyond countless reversions if it continues to alter more and more articles. See: WP:NOTHERE. 190.166.83.153 (talk) 23:20, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note I already reported the user who now made the report here (with no action being taken). 62.74.24.237 (talk) 23:26, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- @190.166.83.153 Like you provided edit summaries on why British should take precedence over English. Such an irony. 62.74.24.237 (talk) 23:54, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Because I explained this to you and you still continue to insinuate that you would alter the nationalities of celebrities originating from the United Kingdom just by changing it to "English" and I have never vandalized by repeatedly changing the term "British" in both the short description and the initial sentence. 190.166.83.153 (talk) 00:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Childish explanation. Raye was described as an English singer for a great amount of time before you changed it without consensus and Weisz found another user, besides me agreeing on the English towards British. 62.74.24.237 (talk) 00:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- You haven't understood, I made several changes to articles about celebrities originating from the United Kingdom because I realized that the "English" nationality doesn't go in the short description, both here and in Wikidata, and England is a country within and part of the United Kingdom in which, for example, a 68,265,209 of the population were obviously subjected by the demographics that compress them and I did not leave any edition summary here. 190.166.83.153 (talk) 00:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Still you need consensus to change English to British and vice versa. Not a valid argument. 62.74.24.237 (talk) 00:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Well, there is a way to change English to British for short descriptions and leave English as the initial sentence, that's how it should be. 190.166.83.153 (talk) 00:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- You haven't understood, I made several changes to articles about celebrities originating from the United Kingdom because I realized that the "English" nationality doesn't go in the short description, both here and in Wikidata, and England is a country within and part of the United Kingdom in which, for example, a 68,265,209 of the population were obviously subjected by the demographics that compress them and I did not leave any edition summary here. 190.166.83.153 (talk) 00:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Childish explanation. Raye was described as an English singer for a great amount of time before you changed it without consensus and Weisz found another user, besides me agreeing on the English towards British. 62.74.24.237 (talk) 00:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Because I explained this to you and you still continue to insinuate that you would alter the nationalities of celebrities originating from the United Kingdom just by changing it to "English" and I have never vandalized by repeatedly changing the term "British" in both the short description and the initial sentence. 190.166.83.153 (talk) 00:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- @190.166.83.153 Like you provided edit summaries on why British should take precedence over English. Such an irony. 62.74.24.237 (talk) 23:54, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note I already reported the user who now made the report here (with no action being taken). 62.74.24.237 (talk) 23:26, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- 5.133.46.67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – IP address consistently making unhelpful edits to various Bangladeshi politicians. Sirocco745 (talk) 00:19, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Kyiv citizen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Repeatedly changing historical place names to modern versions (violating WP:MOS and the RfC consensus at WP:KYIV). Also edit warring now when reverted. R0paire-wiki (talk) 00:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:34, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1700:4A10:C420:88C0:582A:FB74:C63B (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Disruptive IP range continuously edit warring and overlinking plot and cast summaries. Happily888 (talk) 02:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Only two edits in the last 2 months within the /64 range and no warnings issued. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:408C:AD43:BFA2:D21E:84B4:5E93:E962 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism via blanking despite warnings. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:52, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Currently at level III. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. User is engaging in subtle vandalism and disruptively attempting to promote a person named Alex Southey. Clearly WP:NOTHERE. CycloneYoris talk! 06:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- DirtyDusek (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "dirty" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Дельницкий ардамат (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Bitdancer (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: (ltd|pty). Violating string: bltdancer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 01:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Bquid discography (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See the user page. Ruy (talk) 02:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 02:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. CycloneYoris talk! 05:53, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Disackinyomouth (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. KNHaw (talk) 05:54, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Temporary pending changes: I found some IPs of type 62.74.24.215 or different ranges repeatedly messing up the article Raye changing from "British" to "English", as well as messing up categories without having left any summary of editions. 190.166.83.153 (talk) 23:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your own edits would be subject to PC. Are you OK with that? Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to contentious topic. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinate Extended-Confirmed Protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by Auto-Confirmed accounts 142.114.1.184 (talk) 21:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Long term abuse (WP:LTA and WP:EVADE) from a blocked sock-puppet Mikemikev who has been using dozens of accounts going back over 12 years to leave often abusive and disruptive messages on the talk-page. His most recent account has been blocked (check the SPI [5]) but this user creates a new account every few months and uses the talk-page again. Examples of previous blocked socks exclusively using the talk-page to attack other users and cause disruption: Richard Calthrope, Bogestra Bob, Verena Boddenberg, Alan B. Samuels, Cheesecake Denier, Badger Farmer, Redundant Farmhand, Pant Wrangler, Beet Farmer, Retired Farmer, Mbutu Collins, Essentially Dave, Von Clown, David Smyth5, Rupert the Frog, Dave Davidson, Peasant in Suit, BanjoBruce.
This is a form of long-term abuse that has been happening for over 12 years. I believe there should be stronger protection. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm just piping up to say I strongly support this request, and I imagine that many or most of those who watch the page will agree. This talk page is an especially frequent target for time-wasting LTAs such as Mikemikev, as well as soapbox diatribes by IPs. The same thing was done over at Talk:Race and intelligence and the tenor of the conversation improved immediately. Generalrelative (talk) 23:13, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of a multi-IP vandal. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent content removal and unconstructive editing from IP user. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I.Pachu Kannan (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I.Pachu Kannan (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:33, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting temporary page protection to maintain stability while we build consensus on the talk page.
Significant changes were made despite open discussions with no consensus, introducing new sources and altering the article’s scope. I reverted these changes to the stable version ([6]) and invited the editors to continue discussing the individual sources, which is where the conversation was left before the changes.
To prevent potential edit warring and ensure constructive collaboration, temporary protection would help maintain stability while we work toward consensus on the talk page. Qono (talk) 03:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism due to the recent departure of one of the group's members. RachelTensions (talk) 03:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- To admin who will protect the page, I'm suggesting to protect the page for a month or two as IP users will keep vandalizing. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 04:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 04:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 05:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs removing sourced content persistently. Lard Almighty (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Indefinite semi-protection: Please change edit sysop to semiprotected. This is one of my user subpages that I protected as an admin. I'm no longer one, so I'm unable to edit my own page. WikiLeon (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Daniel Case: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Done OK, since we don't yet have a "protection reduced" icon yet, the title of this section of the page notwithstanding ... Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:
"She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"
1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.
Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[7] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.
2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.
- My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).
- If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Old AFDs
- October 06 (Sunday) (2 open / 50 closed / 52 total discussions; open: 1 2)
- October 05 (Saturday) (0 open / 37 closed / 37 total discussions)
Backlogs
Rollback
- Electrou (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello. I have read all the policies and guidelines, I have 200 mainspace edits. Can I get Rollback? Electrou (formerly Susbush) (talk) 10:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Not done given the numerous complaints on your talk page regarding everything from bad reverts to blatant copyright violations. I think it's too soon to be assigning you advanced permissions. Please heed the advice on your talk page and spend a few more months establishing a track record of positive contributions before reapplying. Thanks, Fastily 05:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Blatant copyright vios? I don't do that anymore, If I wait 2 months, can I get Rollback? Electrou (formerly Susbush) (talk) 09:46, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Cooldudeseven7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have done TWO rollback rights request, and I am happy to say that I have surpassed 200 mainspace edits and have also surpassed 1 month of Recent Changes Patrolling.I love the ability to help, and I already love to prevent vandalism with the help of Ultraviolet and Twinkle. I am ready to join the rollbacker force to get access to more tools, like AntiVandal and Huggle for even faster response. Don't worry, I won't bite the newcomers unless necessary! Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 
13:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([8][9]). — MusikBot talk 19:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Could you please comment on this edit and subsequent warning from @Oblivy. Why did you make this edit and do you believe it was appropriate for Oblivy to warn you? -Fastily 05:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- I was a beginner at the time and I did not think that I would have to read the diffs for an edit that causes the word "its" to change to "it's." I really think that it was important for Oblivy to warn me, as it teaches me to never just blatantly use find and replace. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits!
01:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- For what it’s worth the rapid fire use of find and replace gave me some concerns. I did look through their edits and this seemed to be a one-off, and the immediate acceptance of responsibility and efforts to resolve are praiseworthy. OTOH automated tools in the wrong hands can cause a lot of havoc in a hurry… Oblivy (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- I did not mean to cause any harm back then and I now decided that reading diffs is important and you cant just do a repetitive shortcut to find and replace on articles. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 17:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- I did not mean to cause any harm back then and I now decided that reading diffs is important and you cant just do a repetitive shortcut to find and replace on articles. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits!
- For what it’s worth the rapid fire use of find and replace gave me some concerns. I did look through their edits and this seemed to be a one-off, and the immediate acceptance of responsibility and efforts to resolve are praiseworthy. OTOH automated tools in the wrong hands can cause a lot of havoc in a hurry… Oblivy (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- I was a beginner at the time and I did not think that I would have to read the diffs for an edit that causes the word "its" to change to "it's." I really think that it was important for Oblivy to warn me, as it teaches me to never just blatantly use find and replace. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits!
- Could you please comment on this edit and subsequent warning from @Oblivy. Why did you make this edit and do you believe it was appropriate for Oblivy to warn you? -Fastily 05:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for reviewer rights.
Autopatrolled
- Golan1911 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Meets the minimum criteria, and a random sampling of their creations doesn't raise any red flags. My only concern is their liberal use of quotations in reception sections, but I don't consider it an overly serious issue for this permission as the copyright reports come away otherwise clean; I've also started a discussion on their talk page about it. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hounaam (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Dear Wikipedia Admins, I am requesting the Autopatrolled right to further support my contributions to Wikipedia. While I may not have thousands of edits or article creations, my work is rooted in careful research and learning from experienced editors. My focus is on Iranian early modern, modern, and contemporary art and culture, especially highlighting the stories of Iranian women often overlooked in history. I ensure all my edits are supported by reliable, academic sources, and I have a track record of accurate contributions with very few reverts. I believe that having the Autopatrolled right would allow me to continue enhancing the articles related to Iran and Iranian art and culture. Thank you for your consideration. Warm regards, Hounaam (talk) 22:53, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- SafariScribe (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting the Autopatrolled right, like any other editor, to help reduce the NPP work load. I have worked at AFC/NPP/AFD, and I've created good articles that would pass a deletion discussion if nominated. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yut3117 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
They have created 60 Japanese-related articles, the majority of which are BLPs. None of them have been deleted, and no major issues were found upon my quick checks. Thank you. GrabUp - Talk 16:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Chiku2004 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Dear Wikipedia Admins, I am requesting the Autopatrolled right to further support my contributions to Wikipedia. Chiku2004 (talk) 09:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not done All you ever create are two-sentence bios, and those are quick to patrol. We cannot assign autopatrolled for editors who produce bios if they've never written a complete one; you need to show us that you know how to do that. All your bios are missing the sortkey; please read WP:DEFAULTSORT, Chiku2004. I'd also like you to place the relevant stub tag. Schwede66 19:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ibjaja055 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 247 articles on English Wikipedia, covering a variety of subjects. I am currently a New Page Patroller and actively participate in Articles for Creation (AfC) and Articles for Deletion (AfD). I also enjoy turning the red links of notable recent deaths into blue, and I believe this right will help to reduce the workload at New Page Patrol (NPP). Thank you. Ibjaja055 (talk) 00:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)